A TREATISE ON: TOXIC DARWINISM, SECULAR HUMANISM, AND THE DESTRUCTION OF NATIONS INTRODUCTION Darwinism is the foundation of godlessness and godlessness destroys nations. Today we sit helplessly by and lament America’s moral decline. We watch the decadence of Hollywood, endure the activism of our judicial system, fall prey to the manipulation of […]
Category: Darwin and Medical Science
The true atheist is a true Darwinist, which means he or she must define Darwinism as evolution by the natural selection of random mutations, in which there can be no guidance, purpose or meaning in the creation of life. But the true Darwinist must also believe that chemical elements randomly organize to form the biomolecules that will eventually lead to life; this is called abiogenesis and is the subject of origin of life researchers. The purpose of this paper is to demonstrate that abiogenesis, just like Darwinian evolution, is a failed scientific theory.
Darwinists claim the Earth is an open system and entropy does not apply, but truly closed systems do not exist in reality, therefore according to Darwinists entropy must not exist at all because if entropy does exist Darwin’s theory absolutely breaks down.
DNA repair mechanisms present a conundrum for Darwinists–how can repair mechanisms which are created by DNA evolve over time when they are required for the DNA to function in the first place?
The urogenital system is an excellent example of an extremely complex physiologic system that cannot have evolved via the natural selection of random mutations because the system requires two unique components to perform one function.
The newest post, “Darwin’s Theory of Evolution is Inconsistent with Physics” gives a stark contrast between Erwin Schrödinger and Richard Dawkins’ opinion of biology. Evolutionists have much to be embarrassed about.
Darwin, and Neo-Darwinists today, believe there is no complexity that cannot be caused by random mutations. I review excerpts from the textbook, “Neuroscience Sixth Ed.” that provide evidence to the contrary. I also illustrate flawed logic that Neo-Darwinists use to rescue Darwinism from its in
Darwin believed there was no organ so complex that it could not have been created by numerous, successive, slight modifications. But Darwin limited his scope of investigation to gross the shape of organs. Darwin, and Neo-Darwinists of today, ignore complex anatomy and physiology as well as all the complex systems of biochemistry and molecular biology. This paper illustrates complexity that Darwin never understood and Neo-Darwinists ignore.
Fetal circulation demonstrates engineering complexity that requires advanced planning that Darwinian evolution cannot accomplish. The fetus survives in a fluid-filled environment (the amnion) and is busy developing a respiratory system designed for breathing air! This temporary system functions in the presence of; 1) three shunts, 2) unique fetal hemoglobin and 3) a special blood supply.
Neo-Darwinists have assiduously avoided the fact that DNA must code for all the changes that must take place in the human embryo, fetus, neonate and child that eventually produces an adult. And they should. The required information is astronomically complex and poorly understood. Its long past time evolutionary biologists address this complex issue.